PLUNKETT, GREGORY M.1*, PORTER P. LOWRY II2, and DAVID G. FRODIN3. 1Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284-2012; 2Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299; 3Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK. - Molecular data suggest that Schefflera (Araliaceae) is polyphyletic: morphological, biogeographic, and taxonomic implications.
Over the past 30 years, the pantropical genus Schefflera has
been greatly expanded to include all members of Araliaceae with
palmately compound leaves, unarticulated pedicels, and unarmed
vegetative parts. Using this broad definition, the genus has swelled
to over 650 species, representing greater than half of species
diversity found in the family and including many genera that were once
treated as distinct (e.g., Brassaia, Didymopanax, Dizygotheca,
Octotheca, Plerandra, Sciadophyllum, and Tupidanthus, inter
alia). Phylogenetic analyses based on a nuclear (ITS) and chloroplast
(trnL-trnF) sequences agree in suggesting that
Schefflera, as currcently circumscribed, represents a
polyphyletic group of no fewer than four distinct and unrelated clades
within Araliaceae, each of which comprises a biogeographically
coherent group, with two clades of Pacific Island taxa, one of
African/Malagasy taxa, and another of SE Asian taxa, to which the
neotropical Scheffleras appear to be allied. Although our current
sample is non-exhaustive, it includes representatives from nearly all
major segregate groups (sections of Schefflera and formerly
recognized genera) and all geographic regions. Despite the finding of
polyphyly, many of the generic realigments suggested over past decades
are strongly supported. For example, the Asian clade comprises species
once referred to Schefflera, Agalma, Brassaia, and
Tupidanthus, and one of the Pacific clades includes taxa
referred to Dizygotheca plus two informal groups of
Schefflera ("Canacoschefflera" and
"Gabriellae"). The second Pacific Island clade
represents the type section (Schefflera sect.
Schefflera), but this lineage shows no close relationship to
any of the other clades of Schefflera. Overall, these results
indicate the need for massive taxonomic revision, but also hold out
the hope that smaller and more workable groups can be identified for
future, more intensive studies.
Key words: Araliaceae, ITS, molecular phylogenetics, Schefflera, trnL-trnF