DICKINSON, TIMOTHY A.1*, RODGER C. EVANS2, and CHRISTOPHER S. CAMPBELL3. 1Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5S 2C6; 2Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CANADA B0P 1X0; 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5751, USA. - Rosaceae classification and phylogeny: introduction and overview.
The Rosaceae are a family of approximately 95 genera that has been
described as 'indefinable' because of the great morphological
diversity that it exhibits. The family nevertheless is clearly
monophyletic, based on recent studies of DNA sequence variation. The
morphological diversity of the Rosaceae has been recognized
taxonomically in classifications of the family that, after segregating
the Chrysobalanaceae and Neuradaceae, have divided it into four
subfamilies (sometimes recognized as families themselves), and into
from eight to 18 tribes. Within these groups the number and
composition of genera may also be a problem, especially where barriers
to intergeneric hybridization are weak or absent. Also, the size of
some genera may depend on the species concept employed, and the extent
to which this concept takes into account the occurrence of apomixis
and hybridization. One line of attack on problems like these has been
to estimate phylogenies for the family as a whole, or for individual
subfamilies, tribes, and some of the larger genera. Molecular data
support recircumscription of the two largest subfamilies (Maloideae
and Rosoideae), rejection of Amygdaloideae and Spiraeoideae because
they are not monophyletic, and redefinition of many of the tribes.
These studies offer insights not only about the monophyly of these
groups and their relationships with each other, but also about their
origin, as in the case of subfamily Maloideae. Other approaches
involve investigating reproductive behavior and its consequences, or
reevaluating morphological homologies using comparative and
developmental data. All of these approaches will be required in order
to understand the patterns of variation seen in the Rosaceae in terms
of both the overall pattern of evolutionary diversification and the
underlying processes that have shaped that diversification.
Key words: classification, evolution, phylogeny, Rosaceae