MCCOURT, RICHARD M.1, KENNETH G. KAROL2, and CHARLES F. DELWICHE2.* 1Department of Botany, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 2Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park MD 20742. - The roots of land plants: recent research on early-diverging lineages in the evolution of higher drier algae.
Recent multi-gene phylogenetic analyses of charophycean algae sensu
Mattox and Stewart have advanced our understanding of the
relationships of the green algae that are most closely related to land
plants. Several clades of green algae are monophyletic with land
plants (i.e., liverworts, mosses, nonvascular and vascular plants that
arose from an aquatic ancestor) to the exclusion of other green algae:
Mesostigma (a flagellate unicell); the Chlorokybales (small packets of
cells); Klebsormidiales (unbranched filaments); Zygnematales
(conjugating unicells, filaments, and colonies); Coleochaetales
(filamentous and parenchymatous thalli); and Charales (branched
filamentous thalli with complex nodal structure). The morphological
and molecular diversity of the extant members of this nearly
exclusively freshwater clade is remarkable. Moreover, the taxon
diversity within clades is highly asymmetric, having yielded several
distinctive albeit small groups of green algae, as well as one of the
major evolutionary success stories on earth, viz., land plants. The
most recent analysis (Karol et al. 2001, Science 294:2351-2353) of
four genes from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear compartments
strongly support the sister relationships of Charales (stoneworts) to
the most primitive land plants. The analysis also shows that within
this clade there has been a trend toward increasing complexity of
thallus form (from unicells, to filaments, to branching and
parenchymatous thalli) and reproduction (absence of sexual
reproduction to iso- or anisogamy, to oogamy). Although the major
clades mentioned above are well supported by molecular analyses,
relationships among these groups are less well-resolved, especially
for the Klebsormidiales, Chlorokybales, and Mesostigma. This paper
reviews the morphological and molecular evidence for the relationships
among and within these groups. More sequence data from a broader
sampling of taxa at the base of the charophyceans (including perhaps
some algae not now known to be charophytes) should provide a clearer
picture of the evolution of this group and the reasons for its
success.
Key words: Charophyceae, evolution of land plants, green algae, molecular phylogeny